Enola Chiesa vs Maria Garcia Cid Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Oct at 08:14 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Chiesa vs M. Garcia Cid

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chiesa 1 - 0 Cid
They have played 3 sets in total, with Enola Chiesa winning 2 and Maria Garcia Cid winning 1. The last match between Enola Chiesa and Maria Garcia Cid was at the W15 Villena, 23-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Enola Chiesa getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chiesa | 1 |
| Cid | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Villena(10-23-25)
E. Chiesa vs M. G. Cid H2H Profile
E. Chiesa vs M. G. Cid Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Maria Garcia Cid has secured 31.65% of second serve points, slightly trailing Enola Chiesa who has won 34.66%. Could this difference influence the match outcome? The statistics suggest so.
- Return Game Efficiency: Maria Garcia Cid has captured 50.43% of points on opponents' second serves, while Enola Chiesa has a marginal lead with 51.71%. Notably, Chiesa excels on first serve returns, with 38.81% success compared to Garcia Cid's 33.12%.
- Pressure Handling: With a breakpoint saving rate of 37.14% for Garcia Cid against Chiesa's 43.23%, Enola might have an advantage in high-pressure scenarios.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Garcia Cid has a higher win rate of 75.00% compared to Chiesa's 56.25%, indicating a stronger form of late.
- Surface Preference: Garcia Cid performs best on clay (60% win rate) and struggles on hard courts (42%). Conversely, Chiesa excels on hard surfaces (60%) but has a poor record on indoor hard courts (14%).
- Competition Level: Both have predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments. Garcia Cid boasts a higher win rate of 75.00%, whereas Chiesa has 51.72% from a larger number of matches.
- Opponent Quality: Maria Garcia Cid has faced tougher opponents, averaging a rank of 233.08, compared to Chiesa's average opponent rank of 337.6.
- Deciding Set Performance: Garcia Cid has a flawless record in deciding sets over the last year, winning 100%, while Chiesa has won 42%, suggesting a potential edge if the match reaches this stage.
- Event-Specific Performance: Historical performance is crucial, but ongoing event stats should also be evaluated for current form indicators.
Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2025, UTC):
Maria Garcia Cid and Enola Chiesa present distinct strengths, with Chiesa having a slight edge in serve-return statistics and handling pressure better.
However, Garcia Cid's superior overall win rate over the past year, particularly against higher-ranked opponents, highlights her stronger competitive form. Additionally, her impeccable record in deciding sets could prove crucial.
Chiesa's advantage on hard courts is countered by Garcia Cid's steadier performance across various surfaces, signifying versatility.
Considering all these factors, Maria Garcia Cid appears to have the upper hand, making her the likely winner of the upcoming match.
Enola Chiesa vs Maria Garcia Cid Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Chiesa vs M. G. Cid H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:36:1 | Average Match Time | 2:36:1 |
| 65% (55/85) | 1st Serve % | 78% (73/94) |
| 64% (35/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (40/73) |
| 47% (14/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 48% (45/94) | Return Points Win % | 42% (36/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Chiesa Recent Matches Played
M. G. Cid Recent Matches Played

E. Chiesa vs M. G. Cid Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.27% (173/158) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.22% (37/30) |
| 53.01% (396/351) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.74% (79/68) |
| 50.78% (3506/3398) | Games Win/Loss | 52.11% (690/634) |
| 62.50% (20/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (10/15) |
| 52.78% (152/136) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.85% (27/14) |
| 9.09% (1/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 153 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 583 | Total Double Faults | 132 |
| 1:14:9 | Average Match Time | 1:8:53 |
| 396.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.54 |
| 70% (11047/15809) | 1st Serve % | 69% (1996/2875) |
| 55% (6031/11047) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (1096/1996) |
| 42% (2001/4762) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (382/879) |
| 49% (1048/2118) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (192/367) |
| 48% (7418/15401) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1353/2858) |
| 44.44% (52/65) | Challenger W/L | 47.22% (17/19) |
| 56.54% (121/93) | Futures W/L | 64.52% (20/11) |
| 52% (170/328) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (37/66) |
| 60% (30/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 39% (35/89) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 85% (177/151) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 97% (32/31) |
| 15% (177/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (32/1) |
| 13% (153/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (35/6) |